Russia is playing a dangerous game

If Russia loses its streams of revenue from selling its gas and oil to third countries, then it will have a severe impact on the Russian economy. The threat of secondary sanctions has been particularly successful, so Putin would like to avoid that at any cost, There are a lot of questions about … any kind of credibility of agreements with Russia, like how reliable are … Russian promises to stick to agreements of a ceasefire or anything else that might be discussed and put on paper at the meeting in Alaska. Putin and the Russian regime will try to create an impression that they are participating in the negotiations, that they are sticking to some kind of agreements and deals that are being discussed. Reality is they do not  have any intention of actually stopping the war

Analysts at Standard Chartered Bank highlighted that U.S. President Donald Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin are due to meet in Alaska today, “with the U.S. appearing determined to broker a Russia-Ukraine ceasefire agreement”. “Although a comprehensive and mutually acceptable peace deal looks distant, if the talks are positive, and issues such as territorial concessions and political/military alignments can be resolved, we see three key questions emerging for the oil market,” the analysts noted in that report.

One of those questions is “can Russia markedly increase its production rapidly,” the report highlighted.

Responding to that question in the report, the Standard Chartered Bank analysts said, in their view, Russia has been producing unsustainably at its maximum capacity with long-term consequences for its reservoirs. “Crude oil production averaged 9.01 million barrels per day (mb/d) in H1-2025, 0.61mb/d lower than the 2021 annual average (before the invasion of Ukraine),” the analysts said in the report. “If sanctions are lifted, western service companies return and quality replacement parts can be sourced, there is some scope for stabilization, but a rapid increase is unlikely,” they added.

“In addition, the country is beholden to its production cap as part of the OPEC+ production adjustments, with a required level for September loadings of 9.449mb/d, which we see as an ambitious target,” they continued.

Another question is “could more Russian product reach the international markets”, the report pointed out.

Responding to this question, the analysts said it is yet to be determined what an agreement could mean for the additional tariffs and penalties that the U.S. has applied to countries taking Russian crude.

“At present, both the EU and U.S. have imposed sanctions, import bans and shipping/insurance restrictions, with a price-cap mechanism in place. The removal of these restrictions is not likely to be an immediate condition of a ceasefire and would require wholesale political realignment,” they said.

“A removal of the price-cap would eliminate the price advantage for China and India to take Russian crude, and higher freight costs would become more important in sourcing decisions. India has been an opportunistic purchaser of this cheaper crude, and could revert to its previous import volumes, or continue purchases of crude that its refiners prefer, albeit at a higher cost,” they added.

“Given the additional efforts Russia has undertaken to evade export sanctions, we do not expect a large increase in Russian supply to the global markets in the near term,” the analysts continued.

The final question posted in the report is “does the market want Russian crude”.

Responding to this question, the Standard Chartered Bank analysts said, “removing price from consideration, Europe has successfully reduced its dependency on Russian oil and gas over the last three years, and we see limited desire to return to the potential weaponization of energy flows, with concerns over reliability and security”.“Buyer appetite outside of Russia’s current partners is likely to remain minimal in the near term and the re-establishment of trade pathways should take time,” they added.

“Although the market might react to positive ceasefire news by selling-off in the near term, this would be sentiment, rather than fundamentally, driven, and we expect any price-dip on headlines to be short-lived, given the roadblocks to Russian supply,” the Standard Chartered Bank analysts went on to state.

Both Trump and Putin are seeking wins from their first face-to-face talks since Trump returned to the White House.
Trump, who casts the war as a “bloodbath” fraught with escalatory risk, is pressing for a truce in the 3-1/2-year-old war that would bolster his credentials as a global peacemaker worthy of the Nobel Peace Prize. For Putin, the summit is already a big win as he can use it to say that years of Western attempts to isolate Russia have unravelled and that Moscow has retaken its rightful place at the top table of international diplomacy.
The summit, the first between a U.S. and Russian leader since 2021, will begin at 11 a.m. Alaska time (1900 GMT). Trump conceded on Thursday it had proven a tougher nut to crack than he had thought.. Putin might be willing to freeze the conflict along the current  front lines and seize that territory. A deal that Ukraine has repeatedly said it would never accept.