https://youtu.be/CqncA56EzF8
JERUSALEM —The Washington Post. Story by William Booth, Judith Sudilovsky, Ellen Nakashima, Alex Horton.
Early in Israel’s invasion of Gaza, an antitank missile fired by Palestinian militants struck an armored personnel carrier, killing — by incineration, concussion, shrapnel — at least nine Israeli soldiers. Other armored assets in the convoy were also hit. That Oct. 31 attack, on Gaza’s sandy northern periphery, represented the single largest cluster of Israeli casualties in the ground war. It also showed the evolution and expansion of Hamas’s firepower. Where years ago Israeli forces faced stones and molotov cocktails thrown by Palestinians, they now confront weapons such as laser-guided missiles and antitank munitions in Gaza. Hamas has been “arming itself to the teeth,” one military analyst said. The Israel Defense Forces is now inside Gaza City, fighting Hamas above and below ground — among civilians, around hospitals, schools and mosques — in areas the IDF says are honeycombed with tunnels. This is still asymmetrical warfare. Israel fields one of the best-armed, most technologically sophisticated forces in the world. Hamas brigades today may have advanced weapons, but they are clearly outmatched. But in the close-quarter fighting in Gaza, Hamas operatives have displayed some of their upgraded arsenal: a large number of shoulder-fired rocket-propelled grenade launchers and antitank missiles, military experts say. Many of the weapons have been smuggled into the Gaza Strip via tunnels, land crossings and the sea during the past decade, from the spillover of wars in Iraq, Libya, Syria and Sudan, and also manufactured by Iran and even North Korea. Variations of these weapons also have been assembled with increasing sophistication inside Gaza in underground factories. Analysts say Israel has been closely tracking the types of weapons held by Hamas: modern sniper rifles, paragliders, RPGs, “magnet bombs,” one-way attack drones, mini-subs, land mines, antitank missiles and the long-range rockets, which now can strike as far north as Haifa near the Lebanon border and as far south as Eilat on the Red Sea, though still without much accuracy. Hamas and its fighters — an estimated force of 30,000 or more — are so fully armed and well-trained that its brigades, designated as terrorist organizations by the United States, resemble “state armies,” said Michael Milshtein, former head of the Palestinian department in the IDF and a senior analyst at the Dayan Center at Tel Aviv University. Watching the first two weeks of the ground invasion unfold, Milshtein said, “There is actually nothing new or surprising in the weapons themselves. The main surprise is the quantity.”
Milshtein said Israel faces “a much more powerful Hamas.”
Though recent days have seen some limited “humanitarian pauses” in the fighting — alongside demands for an all-out cease-fire from regional powers — Israel shows no sign that it is stopping its offensive, as its tanks surrounded hospitals in northern Gaza this weekend and the medical facilities sheltering displaced people say they have come under fire.
(The IDF says Hamas “cynically” deploys clinics and patients as “human shields.”)
Israel security officials say tanks and troops have encircled several hospitals and they are demanding that staff and patients evacuate. Avi Melamed, a former Israeli intelligence official and the founder of Inside the Middle East, a nonprofit organization focused on education, said Israel will face “very challenging” conditions with Hamas and its armed allies in Gaza. “It is a massively armed enemy,” he said, “not a gang of little kids running around with pistols.” The deployment of large numbers of antitank units by Hamas is especially worrisome for Israeli forces — so much so that the IDF appears to be focusing its intelligence on finding targets for air and ground forces to wipe them out. Every few days, the IDF media office releases information about its troops targeting and killing Hamas antitank commanders. Hamas does not always confirm the deaths of its operatives, making the Israeli claims often impossible to independently verify. Yet it is already clear that this war in Gaza — compared with fighting in 2009, 2012, 2014 and 2021 — is the most deadly. Israeli bombing and ground assaults have killed more than 11,000 people, many of them women and children, according to the Gaza Health Ministry. On Oct. 7, the Hamas assault on farming communities, military bases and a rave concert along the Gaza border, at least 1,200 Israelis were killed and 240 others taken hostage.
Since the beginning of the ground invasion, 41 IDF soldiers have been killed in Gaza, Israel’s military said. The IDF says it would have lost more if it had not spent the last decade improving its armor defenses.
In a May 2021 war, primarily between Hamas and Israel, Hamas antitank missile teams were able to launch strikes that killed military personnel and civilians — proving more effective than drone attacks, said Behnam Ben Taleblu, senior fellow at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, a think tank in Washington. “Hamas drones and rockets were intercepted,” he said. “Their unmanned midget subs were stopped. Cross-border tunnel operatives were detected.” But “their antitank forces punched through and landed blows,” he said. The antitank systems deployed by Hamas include the Bulsae-2, a North Korean copy of the Soviet-era Fagot; the RPG-7, also originally Russian; as well as a North Korean version called the F-7, military analysts said. Other systems seen in Hamas videos in the past include the Russian-style Kornet and Konkurs, as well as the Iranian Raad, which is a version of the Soviet Malyutka.
“Together this cocktail of foreign weapons can complicate even the most high-tech of armies in an urban combat scenario,” Taleblu said.
He added: “Expect more, not less, of an emphasis on antitank weapons and antitank warfare by Hamas as the IDF moves further into Gaza.” During the past decade, many of the antitank weapons were smuggled into Gaza, through the tunnels from Egypt’s Sinai Desert into the Gaza Strip and via trucks traveling across the Rafah border crossing with Egypt, the analysts said. Yehoshua Kalisky, an arms expert and senior researcher at the Institute for National Security Studies in Tel Aviv, said the weapons can be disassembled and the individual parts hidden in food and aid shipments. Among the antitank weapons possessed by Hamas, some are produced inside the Strip, such as the Tandem 85 warhead, said Amael Kotlarski, a senior analyst and weapons expert at the defense intelligence firm Janes. These kinds of projectiles use two charges to punch through modern armored vehicles. They are Iran’s signature weapons provided to allied militants, such as Hamas, and were used to devastating effect against U.S. troops in Iraq. The propaganda arm of Hamas has released numerous edited images of militants firing rockets and missiles at Israeli vehicles. While the videos may show fiery explosions, it is sometimes unclear whether the hits have destroyed or damaged vehicles. Israel has developed a defense to these weapons called the Trophy active protection system, said Ryan Brobst of the Foundation for Defense of Democracies. It works by using radar to track incoming munitions and then intercepts them with its own defense projectiles. It’s been largely successful. But — as with missile barrages against Israel’s Iron Dome air defense — the Trophy system can be defeated by overwhelming it with large numbers of projectiles or projectiles fired at close range, Brobst said. Notably, Brobst said, the U.S. Army received Trophy systems for its Abrams tanks in 2019 and deployed them to Europe. Kalisky, the Israeli analyst, said that in the 1967 Israel-Arab war, Israel in Sinai needed three divisions to defeat the Egyptian army in six days. Now the IDF has been using the same force for almost a month with very different results in Gaza. “This is a different war. It is a very difficult war,” he said. “They are equipped.”
Nakashima and Horton reported from Washington. Hazem Balousha in Cairo contributed to this report.
