Moody’s cuts outlook on U.S. banking system to negative

  • The big three rating firm cited a “‘rapidly deteriorating operating environment” despite regulators’ efforts to shore up the industry.

In a harsh blow to an already-reeling sector, Moody’s Investors Service cut its view on the entire banking system to negative from stable.

The firm, part of the big three rating services, said Monday it was making the move in light of key bank failures that prompted regulators to step in Sunday with a dramatic rescue plan for depositors and other institutions impacted by the crisis. “We have changed to negative from stable our outlook on the US banking system to reflect the rapid deterioration in the operating environment following deposit runs at Silicon Valley Bank (SVB), Silvergate Bank, and Signature Bank (SNY) and the failures of SVB and SNY,” Moody’s said in a report.  The move followed action late Monday, when Moody’s warned it either was downgrading or placing on review for downgrade seven individual institutions. The moves are important because they could impact credit ratings and thus borrowing costs for the sector. In its downgrade of the entire sector, the rating agency noted the extraordinary actions taken to shore up impacted banks. But it said other institutions with unrealized losses or uninsured depositors still could be at risk.

The Federal Reserve established a facility to ensure that institutions hit with liquidity problems would have access to cash. The Treasury Department backstopped the program with $25 billion in funds and vowed that depositors with more than $250,000 at SVB and Signature would have full access to their funds.

But Moody’s said that concerns remain. “Banks with substantial unrealized securities losses and with non-retail and uninsured US depositors may still be more sensitive to depositor competition or ultimate flight, with adverse effects on funding, liquidity, earnings and capital,” the report said. Bank stocks rallied strongly despite the downgrade. The SPDR Bank exchange-traded fund rose nearly 6.5% in morning trade. Major indexes also were higher, with the Dow Jones Industrial Average up nearly 450 points, or 1.4%. Moody’s on Monday downgraded Signature Bank and said it would remove all ratings. It placed the following institutions under review for potential downgrades: First Republic, Intrust Financial, UMB, Zions Bancorp, Western Alliance and Comerica. The firm noted that an extended period of low rates combined with Covid pandemic-related fiscal and monetary stimulus have complicated bank operations. SVB, for instance, found itself with some $16 billion in unrealized losses from long-dated Treasurys it held. As yields rose, it eroded the principle value of those bonds and created liquidity issues for the bank, long a favorite of high-flying tech investors that couldn’t get financing at traditional institutions. SVB had to sell those bonds at a loss to meet obligations. Rates rose as the Federal Reserve battled an inflation surge that took prices to their highest levels in more than 40 years. Moody’s said it expects the Fed to continue hiking.

“We expect pressures to persist and be exacerbated by ongoing monetary policy tightening, with interest rates likely to remain higher for longer until inflation returns to within the Fed’s target range,” Moody’s said. “

US banks also now are facing sharply rising deposit costs after years of low funding costs, which will reduce earnings at banks, particularly those with a greater proportion of fixed-rate assets.” The firm said it expects the U.S. economy to fall into recession later this year, further pressuring the industry. NN: I have been analyzing balance sheets for over 40 years.. Including the pages and pages of foot notes. And after reading their financials with bullshit about their carbon initiative, diversity and the like i want to puke. With  cover pages showing pictures of mixed race couple and LGBT kinder gentler soul mates. I could care less when they fuck, how they fuck, what they fuck as long as it is not me. I can tell you they could ALL win the Booker Prize for the best fiction. They blow politically correct blue sky up your ass. As they use their Worthington business school talents to hide the fact they are ALL broke. And they fucked up big time because they locked in (bought)  3% long term treasury instruments  that are now UNDER WATER. AND TO MAKE SURE THEY REALLY FUCKED UP THEY BOUGHT LONG TERM MBA, CDO long term bundles yielding 2 to 3%. At the time they borrowed short term money at 1% so they looked like MSSSSSS cool and Girly Boy geniuses. Now that THE COST OF FUNDS is 5% SOON TO BE 8% THEY ARE LOSING THEIR ASSES. I do not want to here about more Dode Frank /Dodgee/ Frankie legislation. Especially when they allow banks to book their fixed assets at the purchase price. Not marked to market. The banks of America are hiding a trillion dollars in unrealized losses. And the best Moody’s can do is downgrade the banker ass holes to negative instead of stone cold broke. Why give your safe secure retirement funds to a investment fund that is broke invested in broke banks and corporations. Or worse yet put your funds on deposit at a broke bank that is paying 2%? When you can buy safe secure US treasuries 6 month at damn near 5%. While waiting for a 6% to 8% zero.

CPI shows little progress on cooling off high U.S. inflation

 The Fed didn’t cause SVB to fail, but its aggressive interest-rate increases over the past year exposed the risky side of the bank’s business and may have doomed it to failure. Now the Fed is under pressure to stop raising rates, at least until the fallout from the SVB collapse is more clear. Some worry more banks could succumb if the Fed sticks to its plan. Ye the still-strong increase in core inflation in February makes it harder for the Fed to pause now. Just last week, Fed Chairman Jerome Powell even hinted that another jumbo rate hike was on the table. Senior central bank officials could make a game time decision.  “The Fed and other hawkish central banks now have tough decisions ahead,” senior economist Priscilla Thiagamoorthy at BMO Capital Markets said before the CPI report. “Continue with more rate hikes to extinguish the inflation inferno or pause the process, at least briefly, to ensure financial stability.” The Dow Jones Industrial Average DJIA, 1.09% and S&P 500 SPX, 1.63% were set to open higher in Tuesday trades. Emergency steps by U.S. regulators to backstop the financial system appear to have turned the tide after last Friday’s selloff. NN: The system is broken… but the latest 1 trillion dollar bail out of loses in treasuries held by banks that are underwater will buy them time and even more inflation.

US Core CPI Tops Estimates, Pressuring Fed as It Weighs Hike…… Inflation at 6% well over Feds 2% target

  • Underlying gauge rose 0.5% in February, most in five months
  • Shelter accounted for more than 70% of overall monthly gain

Underlying US consumer prices rose in February by the most in five months, forcing a tough choice for Federal Reserve officials weighing still-rapid inflation against banking turmoil in their next interest-rate decision.

The consumer price index, excluding food and energy, increased 0.5% last month and 5.5% from a year earlier, according to Bureau of Labor Statistics data out Tuesday. Economists see the gauge — known as the core CPI — as a better indicator of underlying inflation than the headline measure.

Underlying US Inflation Heated Up in February

Core consumer price index exceeded forecast in test for Federal Reserve

The overall CPI climbed 0.4% in February — over 70% of which was due to shelter — and 6% from a year earlier. The median estimates in a Bloomberg survey of economists called for a 0.4% monthly advance in the overall and core CPI measures. The figures reaffirm that the Fed’s quest to tame inflation will be a bumpy one as the economy has largely proven resilient to a year’s worth of interest-rate hikes so far. The challenge for the Fed now is how to prioritize inflation that is still far too high with growing financial stability risks in the unraveling of Silicon Valley Bank. Just before the crisis came to fruition last week, Chair Jerome Powell had opened the door to re-accelerating the pace of rate hikes, but many economists now say the central bank will either stick with a smaller increase or pause entirely when it meets next week.

“We got into this mess because a lot of central banks and a lot of economists, the Fed started to believe that inflation was largely dead,” Ethan Harris, head of global research at Bank of America Corp., said on Bloomberg Television. “Now we’re seeing a massive catch-up.”

Two-year Treasury yields, which are sensitive to Fed policy, rose to session highs while the S&P 500 opened higher and the dollar fluctuated. Swaps traders maintained bets that the Fed will lift interest rates by 25 basis points at its meeting this month. Outside of shelter, recreation, household furnishings and airfares also contributed to the monthly advance in the core measure. Grocery prices rose at the slowest monthly pace since May 2021, including the biggest decline in egg prices since the early months of the pandemic. The CPI, excluding food and energy, increased 0.5% last month and 5.5% from a year earlier, according to Bureau of Labor Statistics data. Mike McKee breaks down the numbers on “Bloomberg Surveillance.” The goods disinflation that has driven the slide in overall inflation in recent months has lost steam. Excluding food and energy, goods prices were unchanged in February. Used-car prices — a key driver of slower price growth in recent months — dropped the most in nearly a year. Compared to last year, they declined 13.6%, the most since 1960. Energy prices declined, due to big drops in natural gas and fuel oil prices. Meanwhile, electricity costs rose.

Shelter costs, which are the biggest services component and make up about a third of the overall CPI index, rose 0.8% last month.

Hotel stays contributed to the jump, with the largest monthly advance since October.

The rent of shelter and owners’ equivalent rent categories each surged by record annual amounts of at least 8%. 

Stripping out energy and housing, services prices were up 0.5%, the most since September, according to Bloomberg calculations. Powell and his colleagues have stressed the importance of looking at such a metric when assessing the nation’s inflation trajectory, though they compute it based on a separate index.

What Bloomberg Economics Says…

“February’s CPI report shows that inflation is not vanishing quickly, and there remains a compelling need for the Fed to continue raising rates. A 25-bp move would be appropriate at the March FOMC meeting, followed by a couple more until the Fed reaches a terminal rate of 5.25%.”

— Anna Wong and Stuart Paul, economists

The Fed is also keenly attune to wage growth and how it may be fanning inflation. A separate report Tuesday showed real average hourly earnings fell 0.1% in February from a month ago, and were down 1.3% from a year earlier. The annual measure has been negative every month for almost two years. Tuesday’s report is one of the last major releases the Fed will have in hand before its March 21-22 meeting. Policymakers will also scrutinize Wednesday’s wholesale inflation and retail sales data, plus other figures on housing, manufacturing and consumer inflation expectations. NN: inflation is still climbing in the parts of the report that counts and the FED closely watches. The longer this goes the harder inflation will be to contain.

 

OPEC sees robust global oil demand growth in 2023 after 2022 Chinese contraction

  • Chinese oil demand to fall by 180,000 bpd in 2022
  • OPEC Nov output fell by 744,000 bpd after OPEC+ cut pledge
  • Says relaxation of China’s zero-COVID policy is potential upside

OPEC on Tuesday said it expected to see robust global oil demand growth in 2023 with potential economic upside coming from a relaxation of China’s zero-COVID policies, which this year have pushed the country’s oil use into contraction for the first time in years. World oil demand in 2023 will rise by 2.25 million barrels per day (bpd), or about 2.3%, the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) said in a monthly report. The forecast was steady from November, after a series of downgrades. “Although global economic uncertainties are high and growth risks in key economies remain tilted to the downside, upside factors that may counterbalance current and upcoming challenges have emerged as well,” OPEC said in the report. “A resolution of the geopolitical conflict in Eastern Europe and a relaxation of China’s zero-COVID policy could provide some upside potential,” the report said in a separate section. Chinese demand, hit by COVID containment measures, will average 14.79 million bpd in 2022, down 180,000 bpd from 2021, OPEC said. OPEC figures in another publication, the Annual Statistical Bulletin, show it rising in the 2017-2021 period. An annual contraction in Chinese demand for gasoline, diesel and jet fuel would be the first since 2002, according to Energy Aspects which earlier forecast one. In the report, OPEC nudged up its 2022 economic growth forecast to 2.8% and left 2023 steady at 2.5%. As well as the relaxation of China’s COVID policy, the report listed other sources of Upside potential – or at least counterbalancing factors – may come from the U.S. Federal Reserve successfully managing a soft landing in the United States, as well as from a continued easing of commodity prices and a resolution of the tensions in Eastern Europe,” OPEC said. Oil prices, which came close to the all-time high of $147 a barrel in March after Russia invaded Ukraine, have unwound most of their 2022 gains. The report also showed that OPEC’s production dropped in November after the wider OPEC+ alliance pledged steep output cuts to support the market amid the worsening economic outlook and weakening prices. For November, with prices weakening, OPEC+ agreed to a 2 million bpd reduction in its output target – the largest since the early days of the pandemic in 2020. OPEC’s share of the cut is 1.27 million bpd. In the report, OPEC said its output in November fell by 744,000 bpd from October to 28.83 million bpd, led by top exporter Saudi Arabia and other large producers such as Iraq. OPEC compiles the figures using secondary sources. Based on a Reuters calculation using OPEC’s figures, the 10 OPEC members covered by the OPEC+ agreement complied with 174% of the pledged supply cuts, because some members notably Nigeria and Angola are pumping well below their targets due to a lack of production capacity. This is higher than the 163% compliance rate found by a Reuters survey.

Oil extends losses, WTI down over 2.5%…. SO! its a bargain buy more!!

Crude oil prices fell as the sudden collapse of Silicon Valley bank sparked fears of contagion.

The prices of oil continued to tumble on Tuesday as the latest events taking place in the United States banking sector revived fears over the crude demand outlook. Investors are seemingly concerned that the financial crisis might spill over to a wider range of sectors, which, in turn, could bring about the collapse of the biggest economy in the world. BlagMask Pod Cast:

Do not let them PANIC you

Biden says “Your deposits are safe,”

President Joe Biden spoke out Monday morning in an effort to reassure Americans there is no need for panic after federal agencies stepped in following the failures of two big banks over the weekend.

“Americans can rest assured that our banking system is safe. Your deposits are safe. Let me also assure you, we will not stop at this. We’ll do whatever is needed,” Biden said from the White House.

The federal government said Sunday that all depositors at Silicon Valley Bank and Signature Bank will be protected and be able to get access to their money Monday morning, with the funds coming from special fund set up by the nation’s banks and from the sale of the banks’ assets, not from taxpayers. “No losses will be borne by the taxpayers,”

Biden repeated Monday.”Because of the actions that our regulators already taken, every American should feel confident that their deposits will be there if and when they need them,” he continued. “

Second, the management of these banks will be fired. If the bank is taken over by FDIC, the people running the bank should not work there anymore.”

“Third, investors in the banks will not be protected. They knowingly took a risk, and when the risk didn’t pay off, investors lose their money. That’s how capitalism works.
Fourth, are important questions of how these banks got into the circumstance in the first place. We must get the full accounting of what happened and why those responsible can be held accountable,” he said.

Biden also pledged that he would take action to “reduce the risks of this happening again,” pointing the finger at the Trump administration for, according to Biden, rolling back some of the requirements the Obama administration put in place during their administration. “Unfortunately, the last administration rolled back some of these requirements. I’m going to ask Congress and the banking regulators to strength the rules for banks, to make it less likely this kind of bank failure would happen again, and to protect American jobs and small businesses,” Biden said. His comments echoed what he said in a statement Sunday, “I am pleased that they reached a prompt solution that protects American workers and small businesses, and keeps our financial system safe. The solution also ensures that taxpayer dollars are not put at risk.” “The American people and American businesses can have confidence that their bank deposits will be there when they need them. I am firmly committed to holding those responsible for this mess fully accountable and to continuing our efforts to strengthen oversight and regulation of larger banks so that we are not in this position again,” he said. His comments came just before the U.S. markets and banks open and before he heads on a previously scheduled trip to California. He did not take any questions. NN: Do not lit them shit you…This is a trillion dollar emergency bailout……..

US Backstops Bank Deposits to Avert Crisis After SVB Failure

US authorities took extraordinary measures to shore up confidence in the financial system after the collapse of Silicon Valley Bank, introducing a new backstop for banks that Federal Reserve officials said was big enough to protect the nation’s deposits. The Sunday announcement by the Treasury Department, Federal Reserve and Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. followed a frantic weekend that saw the surprise closure of New York’s Signature Bank along with mounting concerns about spillover effects to other regional lenders and the wider economy.  Regulators acted on a number of fronts to contain the potential fallout:

  • The FDIC said it will resolve SVB in a way that that “fully protects all depositors.” Similarly, “all depositors” at Signature will be made whole.
  • The Fed also announced a new “Bank Term Funding Program” that offers one-year loans to banks under easier terms than it typically provides.
  • The central bank relaxed terms for lending through its discount window, its main direct lending facility.

With a senior Treasury official cautioning there were other banks that appeared to be in similar situations to SVB and Signature, regulators’ top concern was assuring businesses and households they were made whole on their deposits.

That may help avoid any additional bank runs that could heighten the risk of a recession, at a time when the Fed continues to raise interest rates to rein in inflation. In the UK, HSBC Holdings Plc began Monday by announcing it was acquiring the UK arm of Silicon Valley Bank, the culmination of a weekend where ministers and bankers explored various ways to avert the SVB unit’s collapse.

The steps taken by regulators drove US stock futures and Treasuries higher in the hope the shock can be contained. 

US Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen said the actions taken Sunday will protect “all depositors,” signaling aid to those whose accounts exceed the typical $250,000 threshold for FDIC insurance. Fed officials said on a briefing call that their new facility was invoked under the Fed’s emergency authority allowing for the establishment of a broad-based program under “unusual and exigent circumstances,” which requires Treasury approval. It was unanimously approved by the Fed board. The Treasury will “make available up to $25 billion from the Exchange Stabilization Fund as a backstop” for the bank funding program but the Fed doesn’t expect to draw on the funds, officials said. Under the new program, which provides loans of up to one year, collateral will be valued at par, or 100 cents on the dollar. That means banks can get bigger loans than usual for securities that are worth less than that — such as Treasuries that have declined in value as the Fed raised interest rates.

Normally, under the Fed’s main lending program, known as the discount window, the Fed typically lends money at a discount against the assets provided as collateral, a practice known as haircuts. The central bank said the loans under the discount window, which are up to 90 days, will now be subject to the same collateral margins as the new bank funding facility.

The Fed’s emergency lending program is “an admission not only of systemic risk but that the risks are so unusual and exigent that failure to invoke this liquidity could create a financial crisis,” said Peter Conti-Brown, associate professor at the University of Pennsylvania’s Wharton School.

US regulators emphasized that taxpayers won’t be on the hook for protecting SVB and Signature deposits, and Treasury and Fed officials rejected the idea that the banks are being bailed out — showcasing the potential political sensitivities of the weekend moves. The regulators said shareholders and certain unsecured debtholders will be wiped out, while management was fired.President Joe Biden, in a statement Sunday night, said the solution “protects American workers and small businesses, and keeps our financial system safe.” For the Fed, the collapse of two powerhouse regional banks will test their resolve as they decide their next move on rates. Chair Jerome Powell just last week opened the door to a re-acceleration to a 50 basis-point hike at the Fed’s March 21-22 meeting. Financial ructions may raise the bar for such a move, however. While economists at JPMorgan Chase & Co. retained their forecast for a quarter-point rate hike by the Fed in March, their counterparts at Goldman Sachs Group Inc. said they no longer expect the Fed to raise rates. Treasury two-year yields at one point headed for their steepest three-day decline since October 1987, when the Black Monday equities rout stunned markets. Just as that shock interrupted a tightening cycle, traders are now rapidly shifting back to betting on Fed rate cuts for the second half of this year.  More broadly, SVB’s meltdown offered an illustration of the costs of the Fed’s most aggressive moentary tightening campaign since the early 1980s. The lender had plowed money into longer-term bonds during the pandemic, the market values of which dropped as yields then soared. Meantime, SVB’s funding costs surged as the Fed kept jacking up its benchmark rate. “While the Fed wants tighter financial conditions to restrain aggregate demand, they don’t want that to occur in a non-linear fashion that can quickly spiral out of control,” Michael Feroli, chief US economist at JPMorgan Chase, wrote in a note to clients. “If they indeed have used the right tool to address financial contagion risks (time will tell), then they can also use the right tool to continue to address inflation risks — higher interest rates.” The contagion has not been contained. Signature Bank of New York just failed. Here is a tidbit for you. Guess who is on the board of directors. None other then Barney LGTB Frank of Dodd Frank fame. BlackMask Pod Cast:

Dominoes Still Falling

Fed: Silicon Valley Bank depositors to be bailed out…… This after Yellen said not considering bailout of Silicon Valley Bank

The United States Federal Reserve issued on Sunday a statement together with the Treasury and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC) stating that all depositors of the Silicon Valley Bank will be protected and “no losses will be borne by the taxpayer.” The regulators said this will apply to Signature Bank as well, which has also been closed. Depositors will have access to their funds starting on March 13. In addition, the Treasury said it will provide additional funding of up to $25 billion “to eligible depository institutions to help assure banks have the ability to meet the needs of all their depositors.” The funds will be placed in a new Bank Term Funding Program (BTFP) and offered as loans of up to one year. The Fed stated that it “does not anticipate that it will be necessary to draw on these backstop funds.” It insisted that the capital and liquidity positions of the US banking system are strong and the US financial system is resilient. NB: So strong it needed a bailout!!

Yellen not considering bailout of Silicon Valley Bank

mUnited States Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen told CBS News on Sunday that a major bailout of the Silicon Valley Bank after its collapse on Friday is not something the US government is considering doing. In the interview, she discussed the possibility of how the regulators would respond to protect depositors and said that she is working on designing “appropriate policies to address the situation.” “Let me be clear that during the financial crisis, there were investors and owners of systemically large banks who were bailed out…and the reforms that have been put in place mean we’re not going to do that again,” she said. NN: Their was panic over the weekend and another bailout. SVB has the same exposure to rate increases as every other bank in the world. All they did was buy a little more time. You have seen this before. Soon the other shoe will drop.

Yellen not considering bailout of Silicon Valley Bank…..

United States Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen told CBS News on Sunday that a major bailout of the Silicon Valley Bank after its collapse on Friday is not something the US government is considering doing. In the interview, she discussed the possibility of how the regulators would respond to protect depositors and said that she is working on designing “appropriate policies to address the situation.” “Let me be clear that during the financial crisis, there were investors and owners of systemically large banks who were bailed out…and the reforms that have been put in place mean we’re not going to do that again,” she said.

Fed, FDIC to create backstop for uninsured Silicon Valley Bank deposits

The United States Federal Reserve and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. (FDIC) are considering a backstop for uninsured deposits at Silicon Valley Bank, CNBC reported, citing a source. The move is aimed at restoring confidence in the banking system and reassuring depositors that their funds are safe. Under the Federal Deposit Insurance Act, the FDIC has the authority to provide insurance coverage for uninsured deposits in exceptional cases. This can help protect them from losses. The news comes after it was reported that the regulators have taken steps to auction the bank and mitigate the ripple effects from the institution’s collapse. United States regulators are auctioning Silicon Valley Bank (SVB) in order to find a buyer quickly after the institution collapsed on Friday, the Wall Street Journal reported citing people familiar with the matter. The Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. (FDIC) has taken over SVB due to its inability to raise sufficient capital to support its operations. To repay depositors, the regulators are looking to sell the bank to interested buyers through an auction process. It is not uncommon for regulators to use auctions as it allows them to maximize the value of the assets.

Summers Warns Consequences ‘Severe’ If SVB Deposits Not Released…. SVB fallout spreads around the world

  • Former Treasury chief says SVB collapse not a systemic risk
  • Summers says it’s not a time for moral-hazard lectures
  • Very Substantial Consequences

Former Treasury Secretary Lawrence Summers warned that there will be “severe” consequences for the innovation sector of the US economy if regulators don’t smoothly work out the collapse of Silicon Valley Bank. “It certainly is going to have very substantial consequences for Silicon Valley — and for the economy of the whole venture sector, which has been dynamic — unless the government is able to assure that this situation is worked through,” Summers said on Bloomberg Television’s “Wall Street Week” with David Westin. Earlier Friday, regulators stepped in and seized the bank known as SVB after it mounted an unsuccessful attempt to raise capital and saw a cash exodus from the tech startups that had fueled its rise. The lender had plowed the tens of billions of dollars it took in from venture-capital-backed startups into longer-term bonds, a move that led to massive losses.  The Federal Deposit Insurance Corp., which has been appointed as SVB’s receiver, only insures bank deposits of up to $250,000. But a large share of the money deposited at SVB was uninsured: more than 93% of domestic deposits as of Dec. 31, according to a regulatory filing. “There are dozens, if not hundreds, of startups that were planning to use that cash to meet their payroll next week,” according to Summers, a Harvard University professor and paid contributor to Bloomberg Television. “If that’s not able to happen, the consequences really will be quite severe for our innovation system.” Summers said he hoped that regulators will be “aggressive about containing the problem and containing possible contagion.” “I don’t think this is a time for moral-hazard lectures or for talk about teaching people lessons,” he said. “We have enough strains and challenges in the economy without adding the collateral consequences of a breakdown in an important sector of the economy.” The sudden implosion of SVB delivered a deep blow to a sector already reeling from layoffs, falling stock prices and diminishing funding for startups. The bank is most known for its financing in the venture capital community but also serves as a financial supermarket for tech executives, providing mortgages on mansions, personal lines of credit and financing for vineyards. Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen earlier in the day convened a meeting of top regulators, after which she issued a statement saying that the US banking system “remains resilient” and that regulators “have effective tools” to address developments around Silicon Valley Bank. For his part, Summers said, “I don’t think this is likely to be a broadly systemic problem.”  The hammering of SVB’s stock triggered a broader selloff in US lenders, with the KBW Bank Index tumbling 16% for the week — the worst selloff since the March 2020 Covid shock to the financial system. Summers said it doesn’t now look like the biggest banks had the kind of mismatch between the kind of deposits SVB had and “the ways in which they had invested their money in longer-term bonds.” Earlier Friday, Summers said that “there may be a need for some consolidation” in the banking sector as a result of the latest developments. That could then pose a test for regulators, he said. A number of Democrats have pushed to limit bank mergers. For example, Senate Banking Committee Chair Sherrod Brown last year called for “ensuring that bank mergers, if approved, serve American families, small businesses, and communities – not Wall Street and big corporations.”

Summers warned that “one of the mistakes the authorities could make would be — out of a fear of consolidation coming from some kind of populist concern about concentration — blocking combinations that would ultimately operate in the direction of financial stability.”

“That’s something I think that we’re going to need to be attentive to going forward,” the former Treasury chief said. NN: Do not let them shit you this is  a big Deal.  Come NY Monday open they better have provided massive liquidity to high tech.. They risk a high tech melt down and it will spill over. The clock is ticking…..