Bessent: Patience for Iran not unlimited

United States Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent stated on Thursday that “we do not have unlimited patience” for Iran. While speaking at a White House press briefing, Bessent argued that “we did not have a regime change in Iran, but we changed the regime.” He explained that the Iranian government, the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) and the religious leadership are the “three pillars” in Tehran, which have been having “trouble communicating” due to US strikes.

“We are being patient … President [Donald] Trump always prefers a peace deal, so everything that we have done thus far has been defensive, and at present that is what we will continue doing,”

Bessent said, hinting at a possible renewal of strikes if Trump “doesn’t think he can have a peace deal.”

NN: It sounds to me that they have no deal. If they did Trump would be dancing the bouga bouga from his oval office reality tv stage

IEA: Middle East crisis could reshape global investment

International Energy Agency (IEA) Executive Director Fatih Birol warned on Thursday that the world is facing the

“largest energy security crisis” in history, warning the turmoil in Middle East as a consequence of the military attacks between the United States and Iran could “reshape investment strategies globally”

similarly to the oil shocks of the 1970s. The remarks were posted alongside the IEA’s 2026 World Energy Investment report, which said the conflict in the Middle East and disruptions around the Strait of Hormuz are pushing “both producer and consumer countries to diversify energy sources and trade routes.” The report forecast global energy investment will reach $3.4 trillion in 2026, with most spending directed toward electricity grids, renewables, nuclear power, efficiency and electrification, while oil investment is expected to decline for a third straight year, “falling below $500 billion.”

NN: The world is grossly underinvesting in oil. It is the worlds key energy resource and it will be so for at least the next 50 years. So relax hundred dollar  Plus oil is here to stay!

Trump: US not satisfied with Iran’s position

US President Donald Trump said on Wednesday that Iran appeared willing to reach an agreement with Washington, but stressed that the United States was “not satisfied” with Tehran’s latest position. Speaking at a Cabinet meeting, the president commented that Tehran needed a deal because the economy was under severe pressure and repeated that the country could not be allowed to obtain nuclear weapons. “I think it looks like they want to make a deal,” he added. The remarks came amid ongoing diplomatic efforts on Iran, the Hormuz Strait, and the regional security framework for the Middle East.

NN: I still think they are far apart AND Iran is stalling  for time. And it will take the oil market  years to recover

$100 oil for Years into the future

  • Oil prices briefly fell below $100 on optimism over a potential U.S.-Iran deal, but rebounded after President Trump said there was “no rush” and confirmed the Hormuz blockade would remain in place.
  • Analysts warn the market is underestimating the crisis, with around 14–15 million bpd of supply disrupted, inventories falling rapidly, and the IEA cautioning that oil markets could enter a “red zone” by July or August.
  • Energy experts say years of weak investment in new oil supply, combined with the prolonged Hormuz disruption, could push Brent crude into a prolonged $120–$150 per barrel range.

Oil prices opened trade this week with a decline on reports that a deal between the U.S. and Iran was imminent. Brent crude slipped below $100 for the first time in days. But then President Trump said there was no rush on a deal and the U.S blockade in Hormuz would remain. While traders scratch their heads, analysts are warning that crude could remain well above $100 per barrel for years. This is literally uncharted territory for oil. Negotiations with Iran were “proceeding in an orderly and constructive manner,” the U.S. president told media over the weekend, fueling optimism that has actually been a feature of oil markets ever since the Iranian army closed the Strait of Hormuz in response to the U.S. and Israeli missile attacks on the country. Despite the supply crunch that the closure caused, traders remained remarkably certain that it would not last more than a few days, possibly a couple of weeks. Three months in, this optimism remains.

Indeed, oil traders have been boosting their short positions on crude for no less than seven weeks in a row in anticipation of an end to the crisis that has removed some 14 million barrels from the world’s daily oil supply

Rapidly falling inventories, missing Middle Eastern exports, and rising summer demand could push global oil markets into dangerous territory by July or August, the head of the International Energy Agency warned earlier this month. “This may be difficult and we may be entering the red zone in July-August if we don’t see some improvements,” Fatih Birol said. Unlike some earlier warnings that sounded more like a theoretical note, the inventory data increasingly suggest that Birol may actually have a point. Investment in the oil and gas industry has been weak for about a decade, since the U.S. shale boom from the 2010, natural resource analysts and investors Leigh Goehring and Adam Rozencwajg wrote in their latest quarterly commentary. As a result, global production has been largely stalling in terms of growth pace everywhere except in the U.S. shale patch, where growth is slowing down as well. Now, with the Strait of Hormuz closed, the world is in an unprecedented situation of supply tightness.

“The market has never before attempted to function for an extended period with such a large volume impaired simultaneously,” Goehring and Rozencwajg wrote, adding that “The industry appears to have entered another structurally tight phase following years of inadequate capital spending, just as the market confronts an acute physical bottleneck of historic proportions.”

The experts suggested that if the blockade in the Strait of Hormuz extended further in time, $120 to $150 would become the new normal for Brent crude over the next few years—once market players realize the extent of the supply problem, presumably, because right now, this is being grossly underestimated. “At least 15 million barrels per day of supply appears to be directly curtailed. On volume alone, the disruption exceeds every previous oil crisis. Yet dated Brent — still the best measure of physical delivered crude — managed at its peak to exceed its 2008 high by only $4 per barrel,” Goehring and Rozencwajg pointed out, going on to add that “The market, in other words, has been presented with an energy dislocation larger than any previously recorded and has responded as though it were a difficult but ultimately temporary inconvenience.” “Oil moves slowly through the global system,” Goehring and Rozencwajg wrote. “So does information. In both cases, the true condition of the market often reveals itself only after the underlying imbalance has become considerably more serious than first believed.”

NN: This paper market has got its head up its ass. Reality will soon hit them like a bullet to the brain. 

Iran to ban oil exports from region if war resumes

Iran will block oil from leaving the region if the war with the United States restarts and Tehran’s exports are endangered, Iran’s Armed Forces Spokesperson Brigadier General Abolfazl Shekarchi said in an interview with Al-Jazeera on Monday. The spokesman warned that Iran’s response to any new attacks will be more severe. He added that the Iranian forces had identified new targets to be hit if the US and Israel resume strikes on Iran. “The enemies will certainly face new surprises and tactics, and Iran’s campaigns, should the region enter another phase of war, will extend beyond the region’s borders and be far more intense, more brutal, more violent, and more powerful than the two previous wars,” Shekarchi stressed.

NN: I am not buying into this peace deal bullshit. You remember the one they were going to announce on Saturday, Sunday…. Monday… That’s where the oil crises was resolved and the oil was going to flow through the Straights. Excuse my I got to go now and pound my gentiles with a brick so my head won’t hurt!

Trump: No deal with Iran unless it’s meaningful

United States President Donald Trump said on Monday that he will either reach a “great and meaningful” deal with Iran, or there will be no agreement. “I laugh at all of the Dumocrats, RINOS, and Fools who know nothing about the potential deal I am making with Iran, things that haven’t even been negotiated yet … The deal with Iran will either be a great and meaningful one, or there will be no deal. It will be the exact opposite of the JCPOA disaster negotiated by the failed Obama Administration, which was a direct and open path to a Nuclear Weapon for Iran. No, I don’t do deals like that,” Trump said in a post on Truth Social. The US president criticized Republican Senators Thom Tillis and Bill Cassidy, as well as Republican Representative Thomas Massie, claiming that they “do nothing but create division and loss,” after they have been critical of him over his policies.

Iran and US play down hopes for imminent breakthrough in war

  • Talks hinge on Strait of Hormuz, nuclear issues, and release of frozen Iranian funds
  • Iranian foreign ministry spokesperson says US-Iran agreement not imminent
  • US officials say Iran agreed in principle to open strait, dispose of enriched uranium
  • Oil prices fall as optimism grows for US-Iran deal, but energy crisis persists

Iran and the United ​States played down hopes for an imminent breakthrough in efforts to end their three-month-old war on Monday, with the top U.S. diplomat saying Washington will either get a ‌good agreement or deal with the country in “another way.” U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio told reporters in New Delhi that the U.S. would give diplomacy every chance to succeed before exploring “alternatives”, after President Donald Trump said on Sunday he had told his representatives not to rush into any Iran deal. There was a “pretty solid thing on the table in terms of their ability to open up the strait, get the strait (of Hormuz) open, enter into a very real, significant, ​time-limited negotiation on the nuclear matter, and hopefully we can pull it off,” Rubio said. Iran’s foreign ministry spokesperson Esmaeil Baghaei said in a weekly briefing on Monday that a conclusion ​had been reached on many topics, but that does not mean that “we’re close to signing an agreement”. The potential memorandum of understanding contains 14 points and ⁠is focused on ending the war and the U.S. naval blockade of the Strait of Hormuz, in exchange for Iran taking steps to ensure safe transit through the strategic waterway, he said.

At present ​the talks are not on the nuclear issue, which will be negotiated over a 60-day period if the framework accord is agreed, Baghaei said.
Trump has said his key aim in the war is to ​prevent Iran from developing a nuclear weapon with its highly enriched uranium. Tehran has consistently denied it has any plans to do so. A day earlier, Trump wrote on Truth Social that the U.S. blockade on Iranian ships in the Strait of Hormuz would “remain in full force and effect until an agreement is reached, certified, and signed”. Trump raised expectations of an imminent deal on Saturday when he said Washington and Tehran had “largely negotiated” a memorandum of ​understanding on a peace agreement that would reopen the strait. Baghaei said the potential accord contained no specific details on management of the strait, through which about a fifth of the world’s oil and ​liquefied gas flows.
Iran will not charge tolls for ships to pass through the strait, Baghaei said. However, he added there would be a cost for services that will be offered, such as navigation and steps to protect ‌the environment, ⁠under a protocol to be agreed with Oman,
which shares the opposite shore of the waterway. The two sides remain at odds on several difficult issues, such ​as Iran’s nuclear ambitions, Israel’s war in Lebanon ​with the Iranian-backed Hezbollah militia and Tehran’s ⁠demands for the lifting of sanctions and the release of tens of billions of dollars of Iranian oil revenues frozen in foreign banks. Iranian sources disclosed that in future stages, “feasible formulas” could be found to resolve the dispute over its highly enriched uranium stockpile, including diluting the material under ​the supervision of the U.N. nuclear watchdog. A tenuous ceasefire has held since early April. The president hit back at critics of his handling of the negotiations and his willingness to compromise with Iran. “If I make a deal with Iran, it will be a good and proper one … So don’t listen to the losers, who are critical about something ⁠they know nothing ​about,” Trump posted on Sunday.
NN: More Iranian negotiation tricks.

Trump: US won’t rush Iran deal, talks constructive

US President Donald Trump said on Sunday that negotiations with Iran are moving forward in an “orderly and constructive manner,” while stressing that Washington will not rush into an agreement. In a post on Truth Social, Trump said he had instructed US representatives involved in the negotiations to take their time and “not to rush” because “time is on our side,” adding that both parties must avoid mistakes and ensure any deal is properly finalized. Trump also said the US blockade will “remain in full force and effect until an agreement is reached, certified and signed.” He contrasted the current negotiations with the 2015 Iran nuclear deal under former President Barack Obama, arguing the ongoing talks are designed to prevent Iran from developing or obtaining a nuclear weapon. “Our relationship with Iran is becoming a much more professional and productive one. They must understand, however, that they cannot develop or procure a Nuclear Weapon or Bomb,” he stressed.

Trump: It’s 50/50 between Iran deal or bombing

United States President Donald Trump said on Saturday that it is a “solid 50/50” between the option of reaching a “good” deal with Iran or the option to “blow them to kingdom come.” “I think one of two things will happen: either I hit them harder than they have ever been hit, or we are going to sign a deal that is good,” Trump told Axios in an interview, adding that “some people would much rather have a deal and others would rather resume the war.” The US president is set to meet with US Special Envoy to the Middle East Steve Witkoff and his informal advisor and son-in-law, Jared Kushner, later today to discuss Iran’s latest proposal, signaling that he will make a decision on whether he will resume the war with Iran by Sunday.

US said to be readying for new Iran strikes

United States military and intelligence officials prepared contingency measures for potential strikes on Iran while indirect negotiations between the two countries continued, CBS News reported, citing sources with direct knowledge of the planning.Personnel lists were updated and troop rotations adjusted at bases across the Middle East in anticipation of possible escalation. Meanwhile, some US service members canceled their Memorial Day weekend plans. The news follows a report that the two sides were not making much progress on reaching a deal.