The OPEC+ group has made progress in talks with its African producers over their oil output quotas next year, three OPEC+ sources told Reuters on Friday, after the alliance had to postpone this weekend’s meeting over the spat. On Wednesday, OPEC said that the OPEC+ meeting scheduled for this weekend would be postponed to November 30, which sent oil prices tumbling over fears of disagreements in the group about the next move in its oil production policy. OPEC’s African members Angola and Nigeria have reportedly asked to have a higher production ceiling next year, after taking a cut in their quotas at the June 2023 meeting of OPEC+ as they had consistently failed to pump to their quotas. Angola, Congo and Nigeria were forced to commit to lower oil production in 2024, and the originally scheduled November 26 meeting could potentially have pressured them to make further production cuts, as the Saudis express discontent over compliance with the deal as it shoulders the bulk of the burden, according to reports this week. Before the announcement of a delay in the meeting, which will be held online next week, most analysts had expected that OPEC’s top producer, Saudi Arabia, would extend its voluntary cut of 1 million barrels per day (bpd) into 2024, considering the latest slide in oil prices to $80 and the typically weak period for oil demand in the first quarter of every year. Market talk was also intensifying that OPEC+ could announce a deeper cut. OPEC+ will likely reach an agreement at the meeting next week, one of Reuters’ sources said on Friday, feeling “with 99% of confidence” there would be a deal. Two other sources told Reuters that the group was close to reaching a compromise with the African producers on the levels of their crude oil production next year. NN: A deal has been done for significant shared production cuts.
Greek Shippers Halt Russian Crude Transports Amid U.S. Sanctions Push
Three major Greek shipping firms have halted transport of Russian crude in recent weeks due to the heightened risk of facing U.S. sanctions, Reuters has reported. Greek shippers Minerva Marine, TMS Tankers and Thenamaris have stopped carrying Russian oil to customers in the Middle East, Asia, Turkey, Africa and South America, although traders have reported that Moscow still had enough shipping firms for now. The three firms have been among the most active shippers of Russian oil and fuels but have lately scaled down their involvement. The three companies operate more than 100 oil tankers with enough capacity to handle almost all the oil exports from Russia’s European ports of roughly 10 million tonnes a month or 2.4 million barrels per day.
“The dark fleet might not be enough to transport all of Russian oil,” a trader involved in Russian oil shipping has told Reuters. ‘‘Dark fleet” refers to the emergence of shippers that move oil from Russia and Iran, but are not covered by Western insurance.
Last year, Washington imposed sanctions on owners of tankers in Turkey and the United Arab Emirates carrying Russian oil after buying above the G7’s price cap of $60 a barrel. Last week, it imposed more sanctions on three ships. Greece emerged as a new hub for Russian oil via ship-to-ship (STS) loadings after the U.S. and Europe slapped heavy sanctions on Russian crude. Shipments of Russian crude and fuel oil reached several multiples higher at the height of the trade than volumes before the sanctions. However, Greek shippers started cutting their volumes of Russian crude after the price of Urals surpassed the US$60/bbl price cap for the first time in July. According to Argus Media, Greek tanker operators cut volumes of Russian crude by 482,000 bbls in July, with Russian crude falling to 35% of all cargoes compared to 45% in the previous months. With Russian crude now more costly, Chinese buyers have increasingly been turning to other markets which further disincentivizes Greek operators from remaining in the Russian trade due to the complications of remaining sanctions-compliant.
OPEC+ moves meeting back to November 30… A 4 Day Delay To Get Even BIGGER Cuts
OPEC+ has delayed its ministerial meeting to set output policy to Nov. 30 from Nov. 26 as previously scheduled, OPEC said in a statement on Wednesday. The group was supposed to hold the Joint Ministerial Monitoring Committee and OPEC and non-OPEC ministerial meetings on November 25 and 26. Prices of oil futures continued to tumble after the announcement was made, with both West Texas Intermediate and Brent for deliveries in January 2024 falling over 4%. The OPEC+ meeting has been delayed as talks ran into trouble amid Saudi dissatisfaction with other members’ oil production levels. Ministerial meetings will now take place on Nov. 30, OPEC said on its website, without giving a reason for the delay. Saudi Arabia, which has been making an additional 1 million barrel-a-day output cut since July, was in difficult talks with other members about their production levels, delegates said, asking not to be named because the discussions are private. The Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries and its allies face an increasingly fragile picture for oil prices. Crude is down about 18% from its September peak, defying expectations that production cuts would cause a rapid tightening in markets. The outlook for next year looks even weaker, with potential for a renewed surplus
“I think we need a cut,” Pierre Andurand, the renowned oil trader and founder of Andurand Capital Management, said in an interview with Bloomberg television earlier on Wednesday. “The Saudis will probably want the other countries to cut as well, so I think it’s going to be a negotiation.” Riyadh has been widely expected to extend its unilateral 1 million barrel-a-day curb through the first quarter of next year to keep markets in balance. But the kingdom could reverse the measure if its counterparts don’t contribute further to the supply reductions, Andurand said. Securing the cooperation of other OPEC+ producers could be a tall order. At the last meeting in June, African OPEC nations Angola, Congo and Nigeria were pressed to accept lower production quotas for 2024 because their capacity has deteriorated. If these countries were subsequently asked to make further production cuts from those lower quota levels, it could be difficult to accept. The African countries secured the right to a review of their production capacity by external consultants, and Nigeria at least has shown recently it can surpass its new limits. It pumped 1.416 million barrels a day last month, or 36,000 barrels a day above the target for 2024. Meanwhile, the United Arab Emirates has got the right from OPEC+ to increase production modestly in January in order to deploy recent capacity additions. It may be reluctant to forsake that long-awaited opportunity. The revised meeting date of Nov. 30 will coincide with the first day of the United Nations climate talks, known as COP28, which are taking place in the UAE city of Dubai. “If you are in OPEC+ shoes, they must be thinking that something needs to be done,” Christof Ruehl, senior analyst at Columbia University’s Center on Global Energy Policy, said on Bloomberg television. Yet “it will be more difficult for them to do something than people expect. It’s hard to see how they could get on the same page.” NN: this is a negotiation. They will be cutting oil production by a lot, They cancel meetings all the time to whip the members back in line.
Peace in the Valley? REALLY!!! Herzog says Gaza truce deal ‘painful and difficult’
Israeli President Isaac Herzog in a statement commented on the hostage release deal Israel reached with Hamas, describing it as “painful and difficult.” Herzog acknowledged the existing challenges of the agreement, but deemed Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s decision to approve the deal as a significant step toward returning all abductees home. He emphasized the moral and ethical obligation to redeem captives, claiming that is Israel’s top priority. “The State of Israel, the IDF and the security forces will continue to act in every way to achieve this goal, alongside the restoration of absolute security for the citizens of Israel,” Herzog stated. NN: This move on the part of Israel Reality is they will be back at it again real soon. This gives Israel global political cover to continue to slaughter the pigs. The sooner this is done the sooner their will be real peace.
Houthi Ship Seizure Threatens Oil Market Stability
The Iran-aligned Houthi rebels of Yemen have seized a cargo ship linked to an Israeli company in the Red Sea in the latest flare-up in the Middle East that could roil the oil market ahead of the OPEC+ meeting next weekend. Houthi spokesperson Yahya Saree said in a statement that the rebels “carried out a military operation in the Red Sea, the results of which were the seizure of an Israeli ship and taking it to the Yemeni coast,” The Times of Israel reported. The vessel, Galaxy Leader, is owned by a company registered under Isle of Man-headquartered Ray Car Carriers – a unit of Tel Aviv-incorporated Ray Shipping, per LSEG data cited by Reuters. Israel blamed directly Iran for the cargo ship seizure, while Iran denied any involvement in the incident. “Israel strongly condemns the Iranian attack against an international vessel,” a statement by Israel’s Prime Minister’s Office said on Sunday. “The ship, which is owned by a British company and is operated by a Japanese firm, was hijacked with Iran guidance by the Yemenite Houthi militia.” “This is another act of Iranian terrorism and constitutes a leap forward in Iran’s aggression against the citizens of the free world, with international consequences regarding the security of the global shipping lanes,” Benjamin Netanyahu’s office added. Iran, for its part, rejected Israeli claims it was involved in the seizure of the ship. “These accusations are false and caused by the difficult conditions that the Zionist regime is dealing with,” Iranian media quoted Iran’s Foreign Ministry spokesman Nasser Kanani as saying on Monday. “Unlike the US, Iran does not have proxy forces and the resistance groups in the region are the representatives of their nations, and they act based on their interests, and their actions are part of the reactions to the regime’s crimes. It is a Zionist who is committing genocide and war crimes in Gaza under the support of US,” the Iranian foreign ministry spokesman added. The latest Iran-Israel flare-up comes days before the OPEC+ group of oil producers is set to decide their production policy for early next year after oil prices fell in each of the four past weeks.
Speculative Funds Continue to Move Towards Short Side of Crude Oil
Speculative funds have continued to move towards the short side of crude oil markets, analysts at Standard Chartered noted in a new report sent to Rigzone this week. “Money-manager shorts across the four main Brent and WTI contracts rose week on week by 31.7 million barrels to 209.5 million barrels in the latest positioning data, while money-manager longs fell by 16.0 million barrels to 456.4 million barrels,” the analysts stated in the report.
The reduction in the crude oil net long over the past six weeks has been 258.3 million barrels, the analysts highlighted in the report. They pointed out that this is the largest six-week move of money-manager funds to the short side since early March 2020 “at the start of the pandemic”.
“Long-short ratio indicators tell a similar story, with the ratio in the Chicago Mercantile Exchange (CME) WTI contract falling to 2.0 in the latest data, a sharp fall from 11.4 six weeks ago,” the analysts said in the report. “The main theme that emerges among money managers as their motivation for such a large move to the short side is a fear of future extreme demand weakness,” they added. “We think the dynamic behind current speculative flows is a reoccurrence of the macro-led concerns – about the U.S. and China economies in particular – that temporarily took Brent below $72 per barrel in May this year,” they continued. “Speculative net selling was a little slower in May (the six-week rate peaked at 231.6 million barrels, 10 percent less than over the past six weeks). However, the narrative among speculative traders of weakening demand conditions seems very similar,” they went on to state. In the report, the analysts noted that a few supply strands have attached themselves to the main demand weakness concerns. “However, most of them seem to be confusion about seasonality and the relationship between exports and production,” they said in the report. In the report, the analysts noted that a few supply strands have attached themselves to the main demand weakness concerns. “However, most of them seem to be confusion about seasonality and the relationship between exports and production,” they said in the report. The scale of the current speculative move in oil is not justified by fundamental data, the Standard Chartered analysts stated in the report. “Our supply and demand model shows global demand rising 2.02 million barrels per day year on year in October and we forecast demand growth will stay above 1.5 million barrels per day in November, December, and January, with our forecast for 2024 growth at 1.5 million barrels per day,” they continued.
The analysts outlined in the report that, in their view, the latest monthly reports from the main oil balance agencies “also lend little support to the speculative-led plunge in prices”.
“Forecasts for 2024 demand growth were little changed; the International Energy Agency (IEA) forecast increased 50,000 barrels per day to 930,000 barrels per day, the OPEC Secretariat forecast was unchanged at 2.246 million barrels per day and the Energy Information Administration (EIA) forecast increased 81,000 barrels per day to 1.393 million barrels per day,” they noted in the report. “All three agencies increased their 2023 and 2024 forecasts of absolute oil demand in both years, and all increased their Q4-2024 demand forecast,” they added. “The only split came in views of demand in Q3-2023, with respective increases of 330,000 barrels per day and 201,000 barrels per day in the EIA and EIA estimates, but a decrease of 64,000 barrels per day in the OPEC Secretariat estimate,” the analysts continued. The Standard Chartered analysts stated in the report that the extreme demand pessimism the oil market showed in May proved to be unfounded and added that the “speculative led undershoot in prices provided the base for a rally that extended to over $25 per barrel before the macro-led gloom descended again”.
“We think the current price weakness is also a significant undershoot,” they said in the report.
“The scale of speculative selling, the collapse in the long-short ratio, and the media and trader concentration on supposed demand weakness are the same now as in May, and we think the price rebound is likely to be similar,” they added. n the report, Standard Chartered projects that, in the first quarter of 2024, the ICE Brent price will average $92 per barrel and the NYMEX WTI price will average $89 per barrel. Overall in 2024, the company expects the ICE Brent price to average $98 per barrel and the NYMEX WTI price to average $95 per barrel. NN: this is a $20 rise om the current price just on the demand fundamentals. Add OPEC partial embargo soon to be announced and you can see why i expect oil over $120 a barrel. And for more fun add a rocket from Lebanon or Yemen taking out a major building in Tel Aviv and you got $200 oil.
OPEC Said To Consider Additional 1 Million Bpd Output Cut
“You should not underestimate the level of anger there is and the pressure leaders in the Gulf feel from their populations to be seen to respond in some manner,”
Two days ago, JPMorgan’s head of energy strategy Christyan Malek warned that amid the recent plunge in oil prices, driven as much by shorting CTAs (who today are in full-blown short squeeze panic mode) as the Biden admin,
The oil market is underestimating the chances of deeper supply cuts during this month’s Nov 26 OPEC+ meeting.
“The market’s probably assuming very little chance of that happening, I’d say it’s much higher than that – not as a base case but as a scenario” Malek told Bloomberg in an interview, adding that deeper curbs would be
“in order to get ahead of potential weakness in the first half of next year.” “We may need to see” a cut “given where the balances are, particularly given the demand trending.”
And while “there’s a view that Saudi is tapped out”, Malek said that he doesn’t believe that: “I think there’s more flex if they wish to cut. We could see them do sizable cuts from here; having said that, I think it’s more likely they’ll want to socialize them among their OPEC peers – a collective cut rather than one on their own.”
Opec+ is weighing further reductions (in oil production) in response to falling prices and rising anger over the Israel-Hamas war.
While OPEC+ is not getting directly involved in the Gaza war, it certainly did not expect the Biden oil trading desk to hammer oil as hard as it did. If anything, it was expecting oil prices to rise above $100. Or as the FT puts it,
“an additional Opec+ cut of up to 1mn b/d could be on the table, one informed person said, describing the cartel as “galvanised” by the conflict.”
Naturally, the further cuts – which are under discussion by Opec+ as it prepares to meet in Vienna on November 26 – could further inflame tensions with the US, although it appears that nobody in the cartel is even remotely worried about angering the senile US president who just got schooled by “dictator” Xi Jinping during his recent tour of China’s California colony. There’s more: Opec+ is clearly not happy that the US is so openly on the side of Israel in the Gaza conflict. And while the oil price drop is the main cause, “members are also indignant at Israel’s war on Hamas and the humanitarian crisis in Gaza” the FT reports, adding that “Kuwait, Algeria and Iran are among the Opec members most agitated by the conflict.”
“You should not underestimate the level of anger there is and the pressure leaders in the Gulf feel from their populations to be seen to respond in some manner,”
said another person close to senior Opec figures in the Gulf, effectively confirming that an Opec+ production cut would directly target Biden’s policies meant to keep the price of oil (and gas) as low as possible into the 2024 election.
The person said there would be no repeat of the oil shock of the 1970s, when Arab states halted exports to the west. But they added:
“People have become complacent about the potential to tighten oil supplies to send a subtle message, which will be well understood both in the streets and Washington DC.”
If Opec+ can send oil prices soaring again, then Biden is completely finished. Prince Abdulaziz recently hit out at hedge funds that have increased their bets against oil. It’s not just Saudis that want oil as high as possible: Russia depends heavily on oil to finance its invasion of Ukraine, and has been increasing seaborne exports in recent months. However, if it means boosting oil prices, even Putin would be willing to seek a sharp if brief production cut, just enough to spark a worldwide energy panic. The economic reform program of Prince Abdulaziz’s half-brother, Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman requires an oil price close to $100 a barrel: the plan ranges from building hypermodern cities to hosting the 2034 football World Cup. BlackMask Pod Cast:
Warning Oil is About TO SOAR
Iran is ‘testing the waters on how far to provoke the US’ expert sends horror warning
Iran could “test the waters as to how far they could provoke the US“, an expert has warned, while also tearing apart Joe Biden for “sending a message of weakness” as tensions between Tehran and the US skyrocket. Since the on Israel that killed 1,200 people on October 7, Iran’s support for Hamas has come into sharp focus with its proxy group Hezbollah now also heavily involved in the conflict, launching missile strikes at Israeli targets. Iranian Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei denied his country was involved in the Hamas bombardment of Israel, but during a speech last month, said: “America is a definite accomplice of criminals. The United States is in some way directing the crime that is being committed in Gaza.” During recent weeks, Iran-backed militias have launched a string of missile attacks against US bases in Syria, with American forces conducting air strikes of their own on sites believed to be used by Iranian troops.
Nile Gardiner, a Washington-based foreign policy expert, warned that while Iran is already heavily involved in the Israel-Hamas war, it could try to test the patience of the US in a move that could see already volatile tensions completely explode.
He warned “Iran is heavily involved in the Israel conflict in terms of their support for both Hamas and Hezbollah, as well as their use of proxy groups in Iraq, Syria and Yemen. Iran is therefore already up to their necks in terms of involvement. “But what the Iranian regime could do is test the waters as to how far they could provoke the US.”
“It’s therefore only a matter of time before Iran significantly ramps up its attacks on US bases, personnel, and interests.”
Last month, the US built a massive military presence in the Middle East with the aim of sending a strong message to Iran to stay out of the Israel-Hamas war. The Pentagon placed around 2,000 troops in a state of readiness and deployed the USS Gerald R. Ford – the world’s largest warship that can ferry 75 aircraft – to the Eastern Mediterranean, as Israel prepared to launch a ground invasion into Gaza as But Mr Gardiner claimed the Biden administration has not gone far enough to deter Iran, accusing the president of “sending a message of weakness”. He continued: “The unfortunate situation is the Biden administration has not really responded in any strong fashion to attacks on US bases and servicemen in the Middle East by Iranian proxy groups, so this sends a message of weakness. “The Biden administration, against Iran, has launched very limited military operations and hasn’t really done anything. “If Donald Trump was president, he would have already struck directly against Iranian interests, as he did during his time in the White House.
“Weakness invites more aggression and I suspect that Iranian regime views Biden as weak, so they will test the waters further.”
“The Biden administration, against Iran, has launched very limited military operations and hasn’t really done anything. “If Donald Trump was president, he would have already struck directly against Iranian interests, as he did during his time in the White House. NN: Biden (Chamberlain) is courting disaster. Any regime capable of such barbarianism obviously would regard US bombing pf empty warehouses as sign the US has lost its will to fight. On the other hand a Trump administration with all its warts and pimples (Churchill) is one to be feared.
Goldman Sachs Sees OPEC Keeping Oil In $80-$100 Price Range
Last weekend, the Saudi government reiterated its commitment to voluntary crude output cuts of 1 million barrels a day, saying that they would continue until at least the end of the year.
Goldman Sachs expects OPEC to not let oil prices slide too much below $80 per barrel next year and use its pricing power to keep them in the $80-$100 range, the bank said in a note this week, ahead of the OPEC+ meeting on November 26. Oil prices dived this week to their lowest level since July as market participants focused on concerns about the world’s two biggest economies—the United States and China. Goldman Sachs believes that OPEC will use its production policy to keep prices in the $80-$100 range. “We believe that OPEC [Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries] will ensure Brent in a $80-$100 range by leveraging its pricing power, with a $80 floor from the OPEC put, and a $100 ceiling from spare capacity,” Goldman Sachs’ commodities analysts led by Daan Struyven wrote in a note to clients, as carried by MarketWatch.
Oil prices fall further, WTI drops 5% on demand woes
Crude prices declined further on Thursday touching their lowest value in three months as concerns about the oil demand appeared to grow after the latest data showed that industrial production in the United States slowed more than expected in October. The Energy Information Administration previously revealed an oil inventory build-up in the United States, with the steep rise in crude inventories seemingly fueling worries about weakening commodity consumption in the country. The West Texas Intermediate (WTI) for December deliveries tumbled 5.04% to sell at $72.80 per barrel at 12:40 pm ET. Brent for January contracts plummeted 4.79% to trade at $77.25 a barrel. Both benchmarks dropped to their lowest levels not seen since mid-July. NN: In my opinion six months from now oil at these prices will be regarded as the bargain of the century