Israel says it killed high-ranking Islamic Jihad member

The Israel Defense Forces (IDF) claimed on Friday that they killed a high-ranking member of the Palestinian Islamic Jihad, Muhammad al-Jabari. He was the deputy head of the organization’s munitions production unit, the IDF said. The IDF added it eliminated around 30 “terrorists” within the last day, including in “face-to-face battles and air force strikes.” In addition, the Israeli forces said they destroyed a building in Rafah in the Gaza Strip “where many explosives and weapons were stored.”

NN: Sinwar is next. He is not going to be saved by a CEASE fire… UN sanctions nor transgender VOK LEFTY LIBERALS  demonstrations. DEAD MAN IN THE tunnel! The only light at the end of the tunnel for him will be from the flash grenades right  before they blow him into hamburger meat.

Oil Reacts to Developments in Middle East

 George Khoury, the Global Head of Education and Research at CFI, highlighted that the oil market reacted to developments in the Middle East and warned that “risks of a broader conflict seem to be increasing”.

“This threatens to disrupt oil supplies and supply routes and could lead to higher prices still,” Khoury said.

“The recent increase in the crude oil price premium reflects the market’s worries that Iran might become more directly involved in the conflict, potentially threatening the Strait of Hormuz, a key route for global oil transport,” he added.

“Additionally, the decline of crude oil stockpiles in the U.S. also contributed to support oil prices as traders hope for a stronger demand in the United States,” he continued.

Khoury noted in the statement that crude markets could also benefit from softer monetary policies in the U.S. and elsewhere in the coming months. “Lower interest rates could help support major economies and push oil demand to the upside. However, the trend of oil prices could depend on the pace of economic growth in China which has been slowing more than expected,” he added.

JPM Commodities Research team, J.P. Morgan analysts said “oil prices recouped some of the losses on Wednesday, as the killing of a Hamas leader in Iran ratcheted up tensions in the Middle East, but remain at the lowest level since the beginning of June amid market uncertainty around the changing U.S. election narrative and broader macro risk off”. “Physical indicators are also reflecting some deterioration in the fundamentals. The backwardation in the Brent and WTI structures softened in recent sessions, with key timespreads across all tenors the weakest since early-to-mid June. Regional crude prices and differentials have also eased,” the analysts added. In the note, the J.P. Morgan analysts warned that the market remains volatile. “Brent oil was trading below $80 in early June, rose to almost $90 in early July, before falling to the high $70s on July 30,” they pointed out. “Amid this volatility in spot prices, our fair value model remains remarkably stable. The pricing model continues to project Brent’s July’s fair value at $84 (it realized $83.88), and that the price in September would hover at close to $90,” they added. “For the year, the model still shows that Brent would average $83 per barrel (year to date Brent traded at $83.49), and places December 2025 at $63 (published price $64). This stability is even more remarkable, given that our price forecast has not changed since June 2023,” they continued.

The analysts warned in the report that the main hurdle to $90 “remains the misplaced (in our view) doubts about the health of global demand and market’s fixation on a fundamentally weak 2H25”.

“Furthermore, the most important market consequence of a U.S. election that has become more competitive, is a big increase in uncertainty around the outcome,” they added. A victory by the incumbent Democratic party is the most market-neutral scenario, while implications of another Trump presidency could be net bearish for oil as the return of a ‘maximum pressure’ campaign on Iran is ultimately undercut by the negative macro impacts of rising trade tariffs,” they continued. “Consequently, sequencing of policy priorities would become much more important under a Trump 2.0,” they went on to state.

Machine Learning Oil Price Model Predicts Largest Ever Weekly Loss

In a report sent to Rigzone late Tuesday by Standard Chartered Bank Commodities Research Head Paul Horsnell, analysts at the company, including Horsnell, revealed that Standard Chartered’s machine learning oil price model, SCORPIO, is predicting its biggest ever week on week loss.

“For Brent settlement on 5 August, SCORPIO is indicating a week on week fall of $2.86 per barrel, the largest week on week decline it has indicated in the 18 months it has been running,” the analysts stated in the report.

“SCORPIO attributes $1.11 per barrel of that fall to a variety of technical indicators. We think that if SCORPIO is picking up an outsized negative contribution from technicals, it is likely that most of the Commodity Trading Advisor (CTA) black boxes are sellers at the moment,” they added.

“Add the CTA black-box effect to a seasonally quiet late-July/early-August market with relatively low-liquidity and an absence of fundamentally driven oil traders prepared to take on risk right now, and the stage is set for a short-term environment in which algorithms are likely to be more than usually dominant,” they went on to state.

In the report, the Standard Chartered analysts said oil prices have weakened significantly, highlighting that front-month Brent reached a seven-week low of $78.43 per barrel in early trading on July 30.

“The contract settled at $79.78 per barrel on 29 July, a week on week fall of $2.62 per barrel and the first sub-$80 per barrel settlement since 7 June,” the analysts stated in the report.

“We think the renewed slide is primarily due to low seasonal liquidity combined with extremely negative market technicals and a sudden worsening of sentiment across the commodity complex,” they added.

The analysts noted in the report that they do not think the weakness is due to poor fundamental oil data.

“The latest Energy Information Administration (EIA) weekly data was the most bullish in over a year … While recent global balances have been weaker than we had expected, the resultant monthly stockdraws for late Q2 and Q3 are still a hefty 1.5 million barrels per day,” they said.

“While these draws are around 0.5 million barrels per day less than our prior expectation, the gap would not usually be considered large enough to move the needle for prices significantly; and most particularly it would not be expected to cause the $9 per barrel price slide of the past three weeks,” they added.

The Standard Chartered analysts pointed out in the report that not all current technicals are necessarily negative.

“Perhaps the most powerful in terms of their current influence are triangle patterns based on declining ranges,” they said.

“While most technical traders would currently lean towards the view that those patterns herald a sharp move lower, should some key resistance levels hold the triangles could (on a technical basis) set the market up for a significant break higher,” they added.

“For those traders using a more mixed strategy, we have found few who believe sub-$80 per barrel Brent can be sustained on a fundamental basis, but we believe the same traders are almost unanimous in the view that seasonal and technical market dynamics could still cause a temporary severe downwards move,” they continued.

In the report, Standard Chartered forecasts that the ICE Brent nearby future price will average $106 per barrel in the fourth quarter.

A Bofa Global Research report sent to Rigzone this week noted that “oil’s Bermuda triangle is nearing an end”.

“Oil prices have been trading in a narrowing range, or a triangle pattern, for over a year now,” the report stated, adding that a triangle pattern is technically synonymous with a compressed coil or spring.

“When it becomes too tight and what’s holding it lets go, a sharp and sudden breakout trend occurs,” the report noted.

In an oil and gas note sent to Rigzone on Tuesday, Macquarie strategists outlined that oil was “falling on macro and technicals” and warned that fundamentals are “set to drive further downside”.

“Despite the recent pullback, it would not surprise us if prices find support from summer draws through the end of August before beginning a multi-month pullback due to large 4Q24 surpluses,” the strategists stated in the note.

“That said, the odds may be increasing that the market is looking past the remainder of the summer and beginning to price large surpluses from 4Q24 through 2Q25,” they added.

“Key drivers of our surplus balances are accelerating OPEC+ and U.S. supply growth starting in October, weak diesel and softening jet fuel demand growth, and a larger than normal fall T/A season,” they continued.

In the note, the Macquarie strategists said crude is “now below the 200D moving average due increasing global macro and demand concerns”.

“Concurrently, positioning for crude has become increasingly bearish with managed money length falling by a combined 73k contracts for WTI and Brent,” they added.

“We believe recent liquidation is being driven by macro and algorithmic flows as demand from China, the world’s largest crude importer, posted its slowest economic growth in five quarters,” they went on to state.

The strategists also stated in the note that, alongside a weakening demand growth picture, physical Brent has also softened.

“Dated versus ICE Brent fell by $1.52 per barrel over the last two weeks,” they added.

“The reduction in physical tightness is partially attributed to increased U.S. exports into NWE in July as MEH’s premium to WTI improved. WTI cargo resales by Dangote have also softened global sweet balances,” they continued.

Macquarie’s strategists highlighted in the report that both WTI and Brent speculative net length fell over the previous week.

“WTI net length dropping by 21.7K while Brent decreased 21.2K,” they said.

“WTI spec net length retreated driven by over nine times the decrease in longs as drop in shorts. Brent recorded a slightly smaller move with over six times the amount of long liquidation than short covering,” they added.

“Lastly, commercial participants increased length for both WTI and Brent, totaling 35K contracts,” they continued.

To contact the author, email andreas.exarheas@rigzone.com

 

facebook

linkedin
reddit

 

WHAT DO YOU THINK?

Tisha B’Av Perfect Time For Iranian Attack

Here is why: The First Temple took days to destroy. The sanctuary was desecrated either on the 10th of Av (Jeremiah 52:12) or the 9th of Av by the Babolyans now Iran. The Second Temple, was also destroyed on the 9th of AV by the Romans. The 9th of Av is described in Rabbinic Jewish sources as the day both temples were destroyed. It has been observed as a day of fasting and mourning by Jews for millennia, and seems to have biblical roots going back to the Babylonian exile,  Tisha B’Av is “bad luck”  Many contemporary (Ashkenazi) Orthodox Jews avoid travel or anything “dangerous”  The fast of Tisha B’av 2024 (the Ninth of Av) begins at sundown on August 12, 2024, and concludes at nightfall on August 13, 2024.

Israel’s enemies have always chosen Jewish Holydays to attack

See BlackMask Market Update Titled:

Waiting For Iran’s Revenge

 

Can Israel’s Air Defenses Withstand All-Out War With Hezbollah?….. Short Answer NO!

Israel and the Lebanon-based Hezbollah militant group have been exchanging near-daily fire along the Israel-Lebanon border since Oct. 8. The US and France are attempting to broker a diplomatic solution that would end the fighting. Should those negotiations fail, Israeli officials anticipate a full-blown war with the Iran-backed militia. In the last such conflagration, in 2006, an intensive air campaign by Israel resulted in hundreds of civilian deaths, massive displacement and severe damage to homes and infrastructure in Lebanon. Lebanon’s military has no air defense capabilities, apart from a rudimentary air force vastly inferior to Israel’s. Hezbollah possesses surface-to-air missiles, and has used them to knock down Israeli drones over Lebanon. Israeli civilians and civilian infrastructure suffered in 2006 too, to a lesser extent. Now, Israel has considerable air defenses, but a new war could mean thousands of missiles fired daily at Israel that would strain — and possibly overrun — them. Today, Hezbollah is believed to have an arsenal of more than 150,000 missiles, including long-range and precision-guided ones that could reach deep into Israel and target major cities and strategic assets such as military bases, airports, electricity grids and hospitals, according to Israeli assessments.

TOPSHOT-ISRAEL-LEBANON-PALESTINIAN-CONFLICT
Rockets fired from southern Lebanon are intercepted by Israel’s Iron Dome air defense system in northern Israel on July 8.Photographer: Jalaa Marey/AFP/Getty Images

What air defenses does Israel have?

Iron Dome. The most active and well-known of Israel’s air defenses is Iron Dome, which since 2011 has intercepted thousands of rockets fired by Hezbollah and by militant Palestinian groups in the Gaza Strip. The system, developed by Israel’s Rafael Advanced Defense Systems and co-produced since 2014 with the US-based Raytheon Technologies, is designed to counter projectiles and drones with a short range, from 4 kilometers to 70 kilometers (2.5 to 43 miles). Israel’s army says Iron Dome intercepts 90% of such projectiles heading toward populated areas. The Israeli military announced in April that a mobile, maritime version of Iron Dome — known as C-Dome — was operational. It could be used to fend off Hezbollah attacks targeting Israel’s offshore gas fields or ships.

David’s Sling. In 2017, Israel installed a medium-to-long-range interceptor known as David’s Sling, which was co-developed by Rafael and Raytheon. David’s Sling is designed to detect and destroy ballistic and cruise missiles, as well as drones, at a reported range of up to 200 kilometers. That range covers southern Lebanon as well as Gaza.

Arrow. Israel also possesses the advanced Arrow missile defense system, made up of Arrow 2 and Arrow 3. Developers have said the Arrow system can intercept missiles fired from up to 2,400 kilometers away and can do it above Earth’s atmosphere, where long-range ballistic missiles spend part of their flight time. Arrow could be activated if Iran-backed groups in Yemen, Syria and Iraq were to attack Israel to help Hezbollah.

Iron Beam. Israel’s military is testing another system called Iron Beam, which uses lasers to intercept projectiles fired at close range at less expense than the Iron Dome. Iron Beam is not expected to be operational before mid-2025.

Can these systems be overcome?

Already, Hezbollah has inflicted damage and caused dozens of casualties in northern Israel since October using kamikaze explosive drones, many of which are able to slip through Israel’s defenses. The group is thought to be increasing its stockpile of these drones. What’s more, Israel’s army has acknowledged that its air defenses, including Iron Dome, can be overwhelmed if a large number of projectiles are fired simultaneously. Israel expects Hezbollah could fire some 3,000 rockets and missiles every day during a war, far exceeding the capacity of the systems designed to intercept them.

Some of Israel’s newer air defense systems were only recently battle-tested. Arrow 3, which was jointly developed by Israel Aerospace Industries and Boeing Co., notched its first battlefield success in November 2023 when it shot down a missile fired toward southern Israel by Yemen’s Houthi rebels. David’s Sling knocked down rockets from Gaza in fighting that erupted last May. Both were successfully used in Iran’s unprecedented bombardment of Israel on April 13. During that attack, Israel and its allies intercepted 99% of the 300 drones and missiles fired at the country, mostly before they entered Israeli airspace. However, in that case, Israel had advance warning of the assault and received significant help from US and British fighter pilots, conditions that might not be repeated during a weeks- or months-long war with Hezbollah.

Oil Prices Rise Amid Growing Fears of a War in the Middle East

  • Crude oil prices spiked after Israel assassinated Hamas’s political leader on Iranian soil, leading to threats of retaliation from Tehran.
  • The ongoing conflict in the Middle East, combined with record US oil demand, has created a bullish environment for oil prices.
  • Early on Thursday morning, WTI was trading around $78.50 while Brent had climbed above $81.

Crude oil prices continued their climb today after a surge yesterday following the news of Israel assassinating Hamas’s political leader Ismail Haniyeh in Iran and a senior Hezbollah official in Lebanon. The fact the Haniyeh assassination was done in Iran gave a significant boost to prices as Tehran immediately threatened retaliation of the sort that oil analysts have said could send Brent crude into three-digit territory.

“We fear the region is at the brink of all-out war,” Japan’s deputy representative to the United Nations said as the Security Council called on UN members to double down on diplomatic pressure to resolve the conflict between Israel and its neighbors.

“Countries with major influence must put more pressure and work more vigorously … to put out the flames of war in Gaza,” China’s UN ambassador said.

Iran’s representative called the assassination of Haniyeh an act of terrorism, according to a Reuters report on the latest developments in the situation. As pressure remains high in the Middle East, Brent crude topped $81 per barrel before paring some of its gains earlier today, and West Texas Intermediate climbed closer to $79 per barrel. In additional bullish news for oil, the Energy Information Administration reported that oil demand in the United States had reached a seasonal record in May, at 20.80 million barrels daily. That was quite a significant revision from EIA estimates, which saw May demand at 20 million barrels daily.

Global oil inventories, meanwhile, are on a downward trajectory, reaching a record deficit relative to their average levels, Eric Nuttall, senior portfolio manager at Ninepoint Partners told Bloomberg this week.
Nuttall also noted OPEC+ production cut compliance improvements as a factor for a bullish view on oil.

Unless tension in the Middle East gets defused through diplomacy, oil may continue up based on fundamentals and the geopolitical premium.

NN: Its the oil Trifecta. Falling inventories, OPES+ supply cuts and War in the Middle East

Blinken claims Middle East moves toward ‘more conflict’

United States Secretary of State Antony Blinken warned on Thursday that the Middle East region is heading for “more conflict” and urged all parties to halt “escalatory actions” after Hamas political leader Ismail Haniyeh was killed in an alleged Israeli attack in Tehran.

“Right now, the path that the region is on is toward more conflict, more violence, more suffering, more insecurity.

And it is crucial that we break the cycle. And that starts with a ceasefire,” Blinken told reporters in Mongolia. The secretary further said that a ceasefire agreement between Israel and Hamas would bring the Gaza war to an end, but it would also “produce calm in the north, between Israel and Lebanon.” “It is urgent that all parties make the right choices in the days ahead,” he concluded.

Israel confirms death of ‘most wanted’ Hamas military head

Hamas leader Ismail Haniyeh killed in Iran, sparking fears of wider war

The killing, which Iran and Hamas blamed on Israel and pledged to avenge, threatens to plunge the region further into chaos and raised fresh doubts about Gaza cease-fire talks. The killing came hours after an Israeli airstrike in Beirut targeted a senior leader of Hezbollah, another Iranian-backed militant group locked in combat with Israel. The Israel Defense Forces said Fuad Shukr was killed in the Tuesday evening attack, blaming him for the weekend rocket attack in the Israeli-occupied Golan Heights that killed 12. Hezbollah has acknowledged his presence in the demolished building but said recovery efforts were continuing .The deadly events marked the end of two key leaders of Tehran’s proxy militant groups in the region. Reports in Arabic media said that a third, Ziad al-Nakhaleh, the secretary general of Palestinian Islamic Jihad, was in the building where Haniyeh was killed. Israel struck Lebanon and Iran in order “to set the region on fire,” senior Hamas leader Khalil al-Hayya said Wednesday at a news conference in Tehran, adding that Hamas and its allies do not want a “regional war.” But Haniyeh’s killing, he said, “sent a clear message: that our only option with this enemy is blood and resistance.” Security analysts said the events would push the region closer to a regionwide conflict, with Iran compelled to respond to an attack in the heart of its capital. The events come just months after Iran and Israel exchanged missile and rocket attacks in a confrontation that experts warned was flirting with all-out war. Israeli experts said Israel hoped the risk of escalation would be outweighed by a demonstration of military and intelligence prowess that allowed it to reach deep into Tehran. “I don’t think it will change the balance of power or the face of the war, but it sends a strong signal to Iran and the axis [of proxy militant groups],” said Yoel Guzansky, a former official on Israel’s National Security Council who is now a senior fellow at the Institute for National Security Studies in Tel Aviv. “It shows them they cannot be safe anywhere, even in Tehran.” “I think this is Israel getting some of its reputation for deterrence back,” he said. Secretary of State Antony Blinken said the Biden administration was not warned of the attack against Haniyeh ahead of time, nor did it have any part in it. “This is something we were not aware of or involved in,” Blinken told Channel News Asia in an interview in Singapore. “I’ve learned over many years never to speculate on the impact that an event has had on something else. So I can’t tell you what this means” for the region or the cease-fire discussions, he said. Haniyeh was Hamas’s longtime political leader, who lived mostly in the Qatari capital Doha. But his role at the top of the group’s hierarchy has been in question since Sinwar, the group’s military leader in Gaza, launched the Oct. 7 attacks on Israel and had been seen to manage the war along with negotiations for a cease-fire and hostage release ever since. “Sinwar might be pretty happy right now. The two were rivals inside of Hamas,” Guzansky said. Mick Mulroy, a former CIA and Marine Corps official and top Pentagon aide for the Middle East during the Trump administration, said Haniyeh’s killing represented an “absolute embarrassment” for Iran. “Haniyeh was their guest,” he said. “This was a complete failure of their security.” He said Israel “obviously had exquisite intelligence in order to carry out this precise assassination strike.” Suhail al-Hindi, a member of Hamas’s political bureau, promised revenge for Haniyeh, whose funeral is set to take place in Doha on Friday. The killing was a “significant blow to the Palestinian cause,” he said, though he added, “Hamas is an institutional movement that remains unharmed by the martyrdom of its leader.”

Iran orders ‘direct strike’ against Israel for Haniyeh killing

Iran’s supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, ordered retaliation after a humiliating security failure, as Iran once again balances showing strength against the risk of escalation.

People hold up flags and signs in an urban square with a giant poster of Ismail Haniyeh, the Hamas leader.
A giant poster of Ismail Haniyeh
Iran’s supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei,

Iranian military commanders are considering another combination attack of drones and missiles on military targets in the vicinity of Tel Aviv and Haifa, but would make a point of avoiding strikes on civilian targets, the Iranian officials said. One option under consideration is a coordinated attack from Iran and other fronts where it has allied forces, including Yemen, Syria and Iraq, for maximum effect, they said. In his public statement about Mr. Haniyeh’s death, Mr. Khamenei signaled that Iran would retaliate directly, saying, “we see avenging his blood our duty,” because it happened on the territory of the Islamic Republic. He said Israel had set the stage for receiving “a severe punishment.” Statements from other Iranian officials, including the new president, Masoud Pezeshkian, the foreign ministry, the Guards and Iran’s mission to the U.N., also said openly that Iran would retaliate against Israel and that it had a right to defend itself against a transgression on its sovereignty. Iran and the regional forces it backs — Hamas, Hezbollah in Lebanon, the Houthis in Yemen and multiple militias in Iraq — form what they call the “axis of resistance.” Leaders of those groups were in Tehran for the inauguration of Mr. Pezeshkian on Tuesday. Mr. Haniyeh was assassinated at about 2 a.m. local time, after attending the ceremony and meeting with Mr. Khamenei.  NN: Rock and Roll party time